![]() The property is being ‘resurrected’, but it is not known if the fifth film will be a complete reboot.īlue Sky Studios, which has produced animated films such as Rio, Epic and The Peanuts Movie, made its debut in 2002 with Ice Age. Shrek the Third was followed by Shrek Forever After in 2010, and a Puss in Boots spinoff in 2011. The film drew a tepid critical reaction, with critics pointed out that it seemed to be working overtime to prove its wit with a smorgasbord of pop culture references, at the expense of the heart displayed in its two predecessors. The film also starred Monty Python alum Eric Idle as the voice of Merlin, and featured Fiona (Cameron Diaz) leading a posse of princesses voiced by comediennes including Amy Poehler, Amy Sedaris, Maya Rudolph and Cheri Oteri. The would-be heir to the throne is none other than Arthur Pendragon, or “Artie” (Justin Timberlake), who is attending a magical boarding school. In Shrek The Third, Shrek (Mike Myers), Donkey (Eddie Murphy) and Puss in Boots (Antonio Banderas) embark on a road trip in search of Shrek’s nephew-in-law. However, the wheels came off the Shrek train with the third instalment, which was released in 2007. 2004’s Shrek 2, which introduced the villainous Fairy Godmother and Prince Charming characters as well as sidekick Puss in Boots, was a critical and commercial hit. Loosely based on the children’s book by William Stieg, Shrek was energetic, irreverent and contained a resonant message about looking past appearances, and how judging someone on their appearance alone can end up negatively defining them. On the count of three, here is an overview of five threequels in animated film series.Ģ001’s Shrek established DreamWorks Animation as a worthy competitor to Disney and Pixar, even though DreamWorks had butted heads with its powerful rival before. In some cases, animated film series show signs of running out of steam at movie #3, but in others, the third instalment breathes new life into the franchise. The film opened in the United States in June, and has a Rotten Tomatoes score of 68%. The consensus is that Cars 3 is a marked improvement on its immediate predecessor. The first film got a lukewarm reception, with Cars 2 receiving a critical drubbing – its 39% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes is the lowest of any Pixar film. While Pixar’s Cars films are not nearly as beloved as some of the studio’s other output, they have become a merchandising goldmine, even inspiring the Cars Land section at Disney’s California Adventure theme park. There have also been theatrically-released animated films that did well enough to warrant not only a sequel that also opened in theatres, but a third instalment too. In the early-2000s, we saw a trend of animated movies receiving low-budget direct-to-DVD sequels. Some concepts gestate and evolve over several years. Even with the latest technological advances, it takes weeks to produce footage that is onscreen for mere seconds. The Drawing of the Three: animated threequelsīefore Cars 3 zooms into theatres, we look at the good, the bad and the okay third instalments in animated film seriesīig-budget animated films take a lot of work, and often have longer production periods than live-action films.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |